Google Organizational Structure

About the company

Alphabet Inc. is the holding company created in October 2015 to sit above Google, which Larry Page and Sergey Brin founded in 1998. It reported USD 402.8 billion of revenue in fiscal 2025 and employed 190,820 people at the end of that year. Google LLC accounted for USD 401.4 billion of that revenue; everything Alphabet owns outside Google produced USD 1.5 billion.

The business is reported in three segments. Google Services — Search, advertising, YouTube, Android, Chrome, Play and hardware — brought in USD 342.7 billion. Google Cloud brought in USD 58.7 billion. Other Bets, the venture-stage companies of which Waymo is much the largest, brought in USD 1.5 billion. A fourth pool, Alphabet-level activities, carries shared research and central costs and belongs to no segment at all.

That gap between the founding story and the current reporting is what makes the structure worth reading closely. Alphabet was announced in 2015 as a way to give independent businesses their own leaders and their own room. A decade later its annual report names a single executive as the person who allocates capital across all three segments, and the corporate layer above Google is four people deep.

Alphabet Inc. (Google LLC) organizational chart

Alphabet Inc. (Google LLC)'s reporting structure as of 2026-08. Drag to pan, scroll to zoom — or open it in QueryChart and edit it as your own.

Five officers, three segments, and one decision-maker

The chart depicts the operating leadership of Google LLC with Alphabet Inc.'s corporate layer drawn on top of it, because on a diagram the two cannot honestly be pulled apart. Alphabet is a holding company whose Section 16 executive officers as of the April 2026 record date number exactly five: Sundar Pichai, Ruth M. Porat, Anat Ashkenazi, Philipp Schindler and Kent Walker. Four of them hold the identical title at Alphabet and at Google; Schindler is Chief Business Officer of Google only. Everyone else in the diagram is an operating leader of Google or of an Alphabet subsidiary, not a corporate officer of the parent.

The column stripes follow Alphabet's own reporting segments rather than a functional taxonomy, because that is how the company describes itself to investors and how its money is actually counted. Google Services holds the advertising and consumer product organizations: Philipp Schindler's global business organization, Nick Fox's Knowledge & Information group covering Search, Ads, Geo and Commerce, Rick Osterloh's Platforms & Devices, and YouTube under Neal Mohan. Google Cloud is a single column under Thomas Kurian. Other Bets is represented by Waymo, run by two co-chief executives with an explicit split of business from technology.

The column that maps to no segment is the interesting one. Frontier model research sits in Google DeepMind under Demis Hassabis and is charged to Alphabet-level activities, the residual pool that carried a USD 16.8 billion operating loss in 2025 — so neither Search nor Cloud absorbs the cost of the research both depend on. A Chief AI Architect role was created in June 2025 for Koray Kavukcuoglu, who reports to Pichai while remaining chief technology officer of Google DeepMind. It is a deliberate bridge between the research organization and the product areas, and it is precisely the kind of authority a solid reporting line cannot express.

Below the officer layer this is a reconstruction and should be read as one. Neither Alphabet nor Google publishes a leadership page or an org chart, and only the five officers are documented in filings. Jen Fitzpatrick, Lorraine Twohill and Prabhakar Raghavan are drawn as direct reports to the chief executive because their titles are confirmed on Google's own site and that is the conventional line, not because any source states it; Raghavan's tenure as Chief Technologist is firmly documented only into early 2025. The two Waymo lines are ambiguous differently — Other Bets sit under Alphabet, and Porat's published remit covers the Other Bets investment portfolio, so the operational line may run to her rather than to Pichai. The Chief People Officer seat is omitted entirely: Fiona Cicconi announced her retirement effective the end of Q2 2026 and no successor has been named.

Key leadership roles

1. Sundar Pichai

   Chief Executive Officer, Alphabet and Google — Named in the FY2025 annual report as the Chief Operating Decision Maker who allocates resources across all three reportable segments.

2. Ruth M. Porat

   President and Chief Investment Officer, Alphabet and Google — Moved from chief financial officer in 2023; her published remit covers the Other Bets investment portfolio and Alphabet's large infrastructure commitments.

3. Anat Ashkenazi

   Senior Vice President and Chief Financial Officer, Alphabet and Google — The only officer in the diagram with a named report: the corporate controller and principal accounting officer.

4. Kent Walker

   President, Global Affairs, Chief Legal Officer and Secretary, Alphabet and Google — Combines the legal function with government affairs and policy, which for Alphabet is an antitrust and regulatory portfolio rather than a support function.

5. Philipp Schindler

   Senior Vice President and Chief Business Officer, Google — The one Section 16 executive officer of Alphabet whose title exists only at Google; he owns the global sales and partnerships organization behind the advertising business.

6. Demis Hassabis

   Chief Executive Officer and Co-Founder, Google DeepMind — Runs the research organization whose cost is charged to Alphabet-level activities rather than to any product segment.

7. Koray Kavukcuoglu

   Senior Vice President and Chief AI Architect, Google — A role created in June 2025, reporting to the chief executive while he remains chief technology officer of Google DeepMind — a matrix bridge rather than a new division.

8. Thomas Kurian

   Chief Executive Officer, Google Cloud — Runs the only reportable segment other than Google Services with material revenue, at USD 58.7 billion in fiscal 2025.

9. Neal Mohan

   Chief Executive Officer, YouTube — Carries a chief executive title inside a segment rather than a subsidiary; the reporting line to Pichai is consistent with his public communications but is not stated in filings.

10. Nick Fox

    Senior Vice President, Knowledge & Information — Took Search, Ads, Geo and Commerce in the October 2024 reorganization that broke up the previous combined Search-and-Ads organization.

11. Rick Osterloh

    Senior Vice President, Platforms & Devices — Android, Chrome, Pixel and Photos in one group, plus the Assistant and smart-home teams folded in during the same 2024 reorganization.

12. James Manyika

    Senior Vice President, Research, Labs, Technology & Society — Holds research and policy together in one organization, which is why Google Labs reports partly to him and partly into Google DeepMind.

13. Tekedra Mawakana

    Co-Chief Executive Officer, Waymo — Business, operations and commercialization. The line to Pichai is inferred: Other Bets are Alphabet subsidiaries, and the operational reporting may run to the President and Chief Investment Officer instead.

14. Dmitri Dolgov

    Co-Chief Executive Officer, Waymo — Technology. Shares the chief executive role with Mawakana under an explicit split that has held since 2021; the reporting line above them is inferred on the same basis.

How this structure supports the business

One decision-maker over three segments is what lets Alphabet redirect capital into AI infrastructure at the pace it has. There is no negotiation between semi-autonomous business units, no internal market for compute, and no rule that a segment must fund the research it benefits from. The trade between this quarter's margin and the next decade's model is made once, by the person the annual report names.

The thin corporate layer does the same work from the other direction. Four officers above Google means there is almost nothing for a decision to travel through, and because each of them also holds the operating title, a parent-subsidiary question never becomes a negotiation between two management teams that see it differently. Holding-company overhead is close to zero because the holding company is close to nothing.

Class B super-voting stock underwrites both. Directors and executive officers held 54.3% of total voting power at the 2026 record date, so the structure is not exposed to a campaign to spin out Cloud, wind down Other Bets or stop funding DeepMind. Waymo has been in development since 2009, and it is difficult to name a listed company under ordinary governance that would have carried a programme that long.

Advantages and disadvantages

Segment reporting with a single chief operating decision maker lets enormous capital move into AI and data centres without any inter-unit bargaining.

It concentrates allocation authority in one executive and negates the decentralisation premise Alphabet was created on; Other Bets operate under central budget discipline rather than genuine independence.

Housing frontier research in Google DeepMind and charging it to Alphabet-level activities keeps Search and Cloud margins legible, because product P&Ls are not penalised for long-horizon work.

It parks a USD 16.8 billion annual operating loss outside any segment with an accountable owner, which makes the true cost and return of the AI programme hard for outsiders to evaluate.

A corporate layer of five officers, four of whom hold the same title at both companies, keeps holding-company overhead minimal and avoids duplicated management.

There is almost no corporate structure independent of the operating company, so Alphabet is a weak internal check on Google: the same people sit on both sides of any parent-subsidiary question.

Dual-class super-voting stock insulates management from activist pressure and makes multi-decade programmes such as Waymo and quantum computing survivable.

Holders of most of the economic interest control a minority of the votes, so the ordinary governance remedy for a structure the market disagrees with is unavailable.

Interesting facts

• Alphabet has five Section 16 executive officers for 190,820 employees; the corporate layer above Google is roughly the size of a startup's leadership team.
• The FY2025 annual report names one person — the chief executive — as the Chief Operating Decision Maker for all three reportable segments, despite Alphabet being founded on the premise of independent businesses with strong, independent leaders.
• Shared AI research is charged to a residual pool called Alphabet-level activities rather than to any segment, and that pool ran a USD 16.8 billion operating loss in 2025.
• The October 2024 reorganization broke up the combined Search-and-Ads organization: Knowledge & Information went to Nick Fox, the Assistant and smart-home teams moved into Platforms & Devices, and Prabhakar Raghavan became Chief Technologist.
• Board oversight is deliberately separated from management — the independent chair role has been distinct from the chief executive since January 2018, and a fifth standing committee for risk and compliance was added in October 2025.
• Waymo has been run by two co-chief executives since 2021, with business, operations and commercialization split from technology; no other part of Alphabet uses that arrangement.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between Alphabet and Google?

Alphabet Inc. is the publicly traded holding company created in October 2015; Google LLC is the subsidiary that produced USD 401.4 billion of Alphabet's USD 402.8 billion of fiscal 2025 revenue. Alphabet's only distinct corporate roles are the chief executive, the president and chief investment officer, the chief financial officer and the chief legal officer, and each of those people holds the same title at Google. The rest of Alphabet is Google plus the Other Bets subsidiaries.

Is Google's organizational structure functional, divisional or matrix?

It is divisional at the top and matrixed underneath. The reportable segments — Google Services, Google Cloud and Other Bets — are the divisional layer, and the product areas inside Google Services each have their own leader. The matrix comes from AI: research sits in Google DeepMind outside the segments, and the Chief AI Architect role reports to the chief executive while remaining part of DeepMind.

Who reports directly to Sundar Pichai?

Only five people are documented in filings, and four of them report to him: the president and chief investment officer, the chief financial officer, the chief legal officer and the chief business officer. The product and research leaders shown alongside them — the heads of Cloud, YouTube, Knowledge & Information, Platforms & Devices, Google DeepMind and research — are drawn from Google's own author pages and press reporting rather than from a published org chart.

Where does Google DeepMind sit in Alphabet's structure?

Outside the product segments. Google DeepMind is a subsidiary whose chief executive reports to Pichai, and its shared model development is charged to Alphabet-level activities rather than to Google Services or Google Cloud. That is a deliberate accounting and organizational choice: it keeps the segments' margins readable, and it puts a very large research loss in a pool with no segment owner.

How current is this Google org chart?

It reflects the structure as of August 2026, built on the April 2026 proxy statement and the FY2025 annual report filed in February 2026. Executive turnover at this level is frequent, the Chief People Officer seat was vacant at the time of writing, and only the five executive officers are documented; the rest is a reconstruction from public reporting.

Use this org chart template

Open Alphabet and Google's structure as an editable org chart, then swap in your own segments, functions and names to see how a holding company sits above an operating business at your scale.

Open this org chart as your own